Cohort analysis is a powerful tool that can change the way you think about your business. It helps you ask better questions to get the information you need, such as the following: are the new users you’re acquiring every month leaving faster than the ones you brought in last quarter? Are your onboarding improvements actually working or are loyal customers just masking a growing leak? Aggregate metrics won’t tell you, but cohort analysis will.
Below, we’ll explain how to use cohort analysis to discover how customers really interact with your business.
What’s in this article?
- What is cohort analysis?
- How does cohort analysis work in a business context?
- What types of cohort analysis are useful for businesses?
- How can cohort analysis improve customer retention and lifetime value?
- What are the biggest challenges businesses face when using cohort analysis?
What is cohort analysis?
Cohort analysis is a method of breaking your customer data into meaningful groups to track how those groups behave over time. A cohort is a set of users who have something in common: for example, you might group together all customers who signed up in January or all those who made their first purchases in Q2.
Instead of looking at all customers together as one large, blended average, you look at them in distinct slices. This allows you to see patterns that get buried in aggregate data. For instance, a stable customer retention rate might hide the fact that new customers are leaving quickly while older cohorts are keeping the average afloat. Cohort analysis lets you zoom in and see what’s really happening inside the average.
When businesses rely on only top-line numbers (e.g., total users, average revenue), they can miss important nuances. Cohort analysis fills in those gaps by revealing how customer behavior changes over time and which groups are doing well or dropping off.
How does cohort analysis work in a business context?
In practice, cohort analysis means grouping customers by a shared characteristic and tracking how their behavior unfolds over weeks, months, or quarters.
For example, you might group customers by the month they signed up, then measure how many of them are still active or spending each period after that. This creates a behavioral timeline for each cohort that shows when engagement drops off, when it holds steady, and how long different groups tend to stick around.
That structure lets you ask more specific questions than would be possible with aggregate data, such as the following:
- Are customers who joined in March more likely to leave than those who joined in February?
- Did that onboarding redesign in April improve retention in the first week?
- Are users who joined during a summer promotion turning into long-term or short-term customers?
Cohort analysis helps you reconstruct what happened when, to whom, and why. Instead of focusing on one blended average, you’re able to see how each group behaves over time. That provides important context to your decisions.
Cohort analysis allows you to:
- Isolate the downstream effects of a product change
- Measure the true quality of a marketing campaign by both how many customers it brought in and how long those customers stuck around
- Separate the seasonal or promotional bumps from durable improvements in retention or revenue
Cohort analysis shifts your view from static summaries to time-aware narratives, deepening your understanding of how your business grows or leaks across time, one group at a time.
Stripe includes cohort analysis directly in its subscription analytics. Businesses that use Stripe Billing can automatically view subscriber retention by cohort in the Billing Analytics Dashboard: each cohort is grouped by its first billing date, and Stripe shows how many customers from each group remain active in subsequent months.
That kind of built-in tooling allows teams to quickly spot issues and differences, such as:
- Whether new subscribers are dropping off more quickly than usual
- An increase in long-term churn
- Whether specific months or campaigns produce better-quality customers
It brings time-based patterns into view—and with them, clearer opportunities to intervene or double down.
How cohort analysis data is structured
Cohort reports often look like a grid. Each row is a cohort (e.g., “users who signed up in July”). Each column represents a time interval (e.g., “Week 1,” “Week 2,” “Week 3”).
The values in the cells show the percentage of that cohort that’s still active, subscribed, or generating revenue.
That layout tells you where things are improving or worsening.
What types of cohort analysis are useful for businesses?
Cohorts don’t have to be defined by sign-up date. You can group users in different ways depending on what you’re trying to learn. Here are some of the most valuable cohort types for businesses.
Acquisition cohorts
Acquisition cohorts group users by when they were first acquired—by week, month, or quarter. They help you understand how long different cohorts stick around and how changes in marketing, onboarding, or product affect retention over time.
You can use acquisition cohorts to:
- Spot churn patterns early (e.g., “users acquired in April drop off faster than those acquired in March”)
- Evaluate marketing campaigns (e.g., “users from the referral campaign retain better than those from paid ads”)
- Benchmark performance over time (e.g., “Have we improved three-month retention compared to last year?”)
Behavioral cohorts
This type of cohort groups users based on what they did (or didn’t do), rather than when they arrived. You might segment:
- Users who used a certain feature in Week 1 vs. those who didn’t
- Customers who made over 3 purchases in their first 30 days vs. those who made only 1
Behavioral cohorts let you isolate actions that correlate with better outcomes. Consider these examples:
- A streaming app might find that users who favorite more than 3 songs in their first week are more likely to stay than users who don’t.
- A B2B software-as-a-service (SaaS) tool might learn that users who complete onboarding within 48 hours are more likely to stick around in the long term.
This kind of analysis reveals what behaviors predict long-term value. It’s especially useful for product and growth teams that are trying to identify the most effective actions. Just remember that correlation doesn’t always mean causation. You’ll probably need to test your hypotheses before you act on them at scale.
Predictive cohorts
Predictive cohorts use models to group users based on what they’re likely to do in the future (e.g., leaving, upgrading, making a repeat purchase). You’re proactively segmenting based on projected behavior.
For instance, you might:
- Flag the 10% of new users who are most likely to become long-term heavy users and give them white-glove onboarding
- Identify customers at high risk of churn and target them with promotional offers
- Avoid overspending by excluding low-probability buyers from retargeting campaigns
This kind of analysis is powerful but harder to pull off. It usually requires solid data infrastructure, good models, and enough user volume to make predictions. It’s more common in larger or more data-mature organizations.
Each of these cohort types answers a different question. Acquisition cohorts tell you when users are dropping off. Behavior cohorts tell you what drives long-term success. Predictive cohorts tell you who you should contact right now. Used together, they offer a 360-degree view of your customer lifecycle—what’s working, what’s not, and where to intervene for better outcomes.
How can cohort analysis improve customer retention and lifetime value?
Cohort analysis helps businesses shift from broad guesses to targeted actions. Instead of trying to improve customer lifetime value (LTV) and retention across the board, you can see exactly where and when customers disengage.
Here’s what cohort analysis can help you do.
Spot the drop-off points
Cohort data shows when customers tend to leave. Once you know the drop-off window, you can target it directly.
Here are some examples:
- If multiple cohorts leave around Day 14, you might adjust onboarding, add reminders, or time a well-placed incentive right before that window.
- If Q3 customers are disappearing faster than others, that’s a cue to investigate what changed. Is it the channel mix, the messaging, or the support availability?
Cohort analysis shows when churn happens and under what conditions it does.
Find out what’s working
Cohort analysis can reveal which groups are sticking around and what they did early on that might have contributed to their decision.
You might discover that:
- A particular cohort with unusually high LTV was acquired through referrals.
- Users who complete a setup checklist in the first 24 hours stick around twice as long.
- Customers who subscribe on desktop tend to stay longer than those who start on mobile.
This kind of insight lets you double down on high-performing behaviors, channels, or flows. Instead of applying broad fixes, you reinforce what already works for your best users.
Build smarter segments
Cohort analysis naturally segments your customers by time, behavior, or predicted value. That’s valuable for retention marketing and lifecycle messaging.
Consider these examples:
- If customers from discount campaigns leave sooner, you might nurture them differently or rethink the campaign.
- If heavy users from self-service sign-ups remain more often, they might not need the same onboarding emails as other segments.
This kind of segmentation keeps you from overserving users who don’t need help and underserving the ones who do.
Measure the impact of changes
Once you roll out a new feature, campaign, or onboarding flow, cohort analysis lets you see if it’s actually working.
For instance, if you retain June’s cohort better than May’s, that could signal progress. If you don’t, you know early that something needs to be reworked.
What are the biggest challenges businesses face when using cohort analysis?
Cohort analysis is powerful. But like any tool, it has flaws and potential pitfalls. Here are common challenges teams encounter and how to address them.
Messy or incomplete data
Cohort analysis depends on solid inputs: clean event data, consistent time stamps, and tracking across systems. If those pieces aren’t in place, your results will be unreliable.
Common issues include:
- Missing or inconsistent sign-up dates
- Events that are tracked in one system but not in another
- Gaps between product, marketing, and payment systems
To fix this issue, put your data infrastructure in order before you dive into analysis. Ensure key customer actions are tracked, time-stamped, and unified in one place. Tools like Stripe Sigma can help teams pull clean, joined datasets directly from payments and billing. These are often the missing link.
Tools that don’t match your needs
Historically, cohort analysis required Structured Query Language (SQL) chops and manual spreadsheet work. Now, many platforms offer ready-to-use cohort analysis, but not all teams have the right access or know where to look. Some businesses get stuck either avoiding cohort analysis altogether because it feels too complex or doing it in a time-consuming, error-prone way.
The solution is to start with whatever is easiest and available. Stripe Billing, for instance, shows subscriber retention by cohort with no extra setup. Ecommerce platforms often do the same with repeat purchase data. If your business is small, even a basic spreadsheet model can be useful.
Oversegmentation or undersegmentation
If you create too many cohorts, your sample sizes shrink to the point of meaninglessness. If you create too few, you’re back to looking at overly broad trends.
To strike the right balance:
- Start with time-based cohorts to establish a baseline
- Layer in additional segmentation only when it serves a clear hypothesis (e.g., “users from the referral campaign remain longer than paid ad users”)
- Watch your sample sizes—if a cohort has only six people in it, treat any corresponding trends cautiously
It’s better to ask one precise question than to create a dashboard full of slices you can’t interpret.
Misreading data
Cohort analysis can offer powerful signals, but it takes time and care to interpret them correctly. Some common traps include mistaking correlation for causation (e.g., assuming a feature caused higher retention when it might just attract more engaged users) and ignoring external context (e.g., a holiday peak or competitor promo that impacts one cohort’s behavior).
Treat cohort patterns as hypotheses, not conclusions. Pair them with qualitative insight or A/B testing when possible. And always look at cohorts in context: mark your charts with product launches, campaign dates, and known disruptions.
Getting overwhelmed by data
It’s easy to get overwhelmed by dozens of cohorts, each with its own retention curve, revenue arc, and behavior profile.
To avoid analysis paralysis:
- Tie your cohort work to a specific question or decision (e.g., “Did the new onboarding improve 30-day retention?”)
- Summarize with important metrics that track across time, such as Month 3 retention and 90-day LTV
- Review cohorts regularly as a team so insight can lead to real changes
The content in this article is for general information and education purposes only and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. Stripe does not warrant or guarantee the accurateness, completeness, adequacy, or currency of the information in the article. You should seek the advice of a competent attorney or accountant licensed to practice in your jurisdiction for advice on your particular situation.