Choosing a billing vendor is one of the most consequential infrastructure decisions a growing business makes. Get it right and you have a system that scales with your pricing model, handles global compliance automatically, and keeps revenue flowing reliably. Get it wrong and you're looking at months of rework and revenue leakage.

This template gives you a structured, end-to-end way to run a billing vendor RFP — from administrative ground rules through to detailed requirements, commercials, and evaluation scoring.

It's built around the capabilities that matter most for subscription businesses in 2025: usage-based and multi-attribute pricing, ML-powered payment recovery, real-time revenue analytics, global tax compliance, and emerging requirements like agentic commerce and embedded financial products.

This RFP template isn’t meant to be used as a rigid form. It’s more like a guide you can (and should) customize to your specific needs. Each section comes with prompts to help you write questions that get you useful answers, not just marketing blurbs. Fill in the blanks with specifics about your project, push for detail where it matters most, and cut anything that doesn’t apply. When it’s used well, this RFP template can save you time, reveal suitable vendors, and better inform your final decision.

Table of contents

• Cover Page
  
• Section A: Administrative instructions
  
• Section B: Overview and scope of work
  
• Section C: Proposal instructions
  
• Section D: Evaluation process
  
• Section E: Core requirements
  
• Section F: Implementation and support
  
• Section G: Commercials
  
• Section H: Vendor profile
  
• Section I: References
  
• Section J: Appendixes
  

Cover page

The goal of the cover page is to tell vendors exactly what they’re looking at and whom to talk to. Include the RFP title, your company’s name, a short confidentiality notice, and contact details for the person who manages the process. Dates matter, too. List the issue date and due date right up front so nobody can claim they missed them. Keep the cover page concise. It should be about orientation, not showing off what your design team can do.

Here’s what to include in this section:

• Title: Request for Proposal (RFP) for [project/service/product]
  
• Issuing organization: [Your company]
  
• Confidentiality notice: (Short, NDA-bound language)
  
• Point of contact: [Name, title, email, phone]
  
• Issue date and due date
  

You might want to design your own branded RFP document. In that case, the outlines in each section will give you a strong foundation. Below, we’ve also added sample copy you can use.

Contact information

Key dates

Submission format
All responses must be submitted electronically via email in PDF format. Pricing and scoring templates (provided separately in Excel) must be attached in their original formats.

File naming convention
[Vendor Name]–[Project Name]–RFP–Response–[Date].pdf

Purpose of this RFP
[Your company] is seeking a billing partner capable of supporting secure, multicurrency transactions, integrating easily with internal systems via modern APIs, and delivering high reliability, proactive fraud detection, and data transparency across regions.

This document outlines the requirements, evaluation criteria, and process for submitting proposals.

Short confidentiality notice
This RFP contains confidential and proprietary information belonging to [your company]. It’s provided solely for the purpose of preparing a response. Distribution beyond those directly involved in preparing a proposal is prohibited. By accepting this RFP, the recipient agrees to protect this information with at least the same degree of care they use to protect their own confidential information.

Section A: Administrative instructions

This section sets the ground rules. Before vendors invest time in a response, they need to know how the process works, what's expected, and what the timeline looks like. Ambiguity here creates problems later — be precise.

Here's what to include:

• Confidentiality and nondisclosure obligations
  
• Limitation of liability
  
• RFP timeline with key dates
  
• Submission format and file naming conventions
  
• Point of contact and communication rules
  
• Vendor acknowledgment form
  

Here’s an example of how this could look.

A.1 Statement of confidentiality and nondisclosure

All information in this RFP is confidential and intended solely to enable the vendor to prepare a response. Vendors must not disclose, reproduce, or distribute this RFP or any portion of it to third parties without prior written consent from [your company]. If the vendor includes proprietary information in its proposal, that information should be clearly labeled. [Your company] will treat it accordingly.

A.2 Limitation of financial liability

This RFP is not an offer to contract. [Your company] is under no obligation to award a contract or reimburse costs incurred in preparing a response. Vendors are solely responsible for their own expenses throughout this process.

A.3 RFP timeline

A.4 Submission guidelines

• All proposals must be submitted by email to [contact email address].
  
• Vendors must acknowledge receipt within three business days of issue.
  
• Questions must be submitted in writing by the date listed in A.3.
  
• All communication must go through the designated RFP manager. Direct contact with other [your company] employees during the evaluation period is not permitted and may result in disqualification.
  

A.5 Required submission documents

Each vendor must include the following materials in its submission.

A.6 Evaluation overview

[Your company] will evaluate proposals on billing functionality, technical architecture, global compliance coverage, payment recovery performance, revenue reporting depth, implementation approach, and vendor stability. Vendors that demonstrate ML-driven optimization, real-time analytics, strong API performance, and readiness for agentic and AI-initiated billing workflows will be prioritized.

A.7 Vendor acknowledgment

Vendors must complete and return the acknowledgment below within three business days of receiving this RFP.

We acknowledge receipt of the RFP titled "[RFP name]" and confirm our intention ☐ to submit / ☐ not to submit a response.

Company name: ________________________
Authorized representative: ________________________
Title: ________________________
Date: ________

Section B: Overview and scope of work

A vague overview produces generic proposals. Give vendors the context they need to respond intelligently — your business model, pricing complexity, the markets you serve, and the specific problems you're trying to solve.

Here’s an example of how this could look.

B.1 Company background

Sample copy — customize before sending:

[Your company] is a [global / regional] technology company operating in [insert markets], serving [insert customer type] with [insert product or service description]. Our billing operations span [X] markets and support [describe pricing models — e.g., usage-based, subscription, and hybrid plans].

We currently invoice [approximate volume] customers per month across [X] currencies. We are seeking a billing partner whose platform scales with our business, handles complex pricing logic without bespoke engineering, and maintains compliance with the tax and regulatory requirements of each market we operate in.

Additional details to customize:

• Headquarters and key markets
  
• Approximate annual revenue or billing volume
  
• Internal teams involved — Finance, Engineering, Compliance, RevOps, Customer Success
  

B.2 Project purpose

Sample copy — customize before sending:

This RFP exists to identify a billing platform that supports the next phase of our growth. Our current setup [describe the gap — e.g., cannot handle usage-based pricing, lacks global tax compliance, does not integrate with our ERP, or cannot support AI-initiated subscription changes].

Our ideal partner will enable:

• Flexible pricing model support — usage-based, flat-rate, tiered, multi-attribute, and hybrid in a single platform
  
• Automated global tax calculation and invoice compliance, including sales tax, VAT, and country-specific formats
  
• Industry-leading payment recovery rates driven by ML-powered retry logic and intelligent dunning
  
• Real-time subscription and revenue analytics accessible to both technical and non-technical teams
  
• Seamless integration with our CRM, ERP, data warehouse, and accounting systems via well-documented APIs
  
• Readiness for agentic commerce — vendor systems that support subscription actions initiated by AI agents or automated workflows
  

B.3 Scope of work

Sample copy — customize before sending:

Core deliverables:

• End-to-end subscription lifecycle management including trials, upgrades, downgrades, pauses, and cancellations
  
• Support for diverse pricing models: usage-based billing with granular aggregation, tiered pricing, multi-attribute pricing (e.g., seats plus usage), and installment plans
  
• Automated tax calculation and localized invoicing across all markets where [your company] operates
  
• Integration with [CRM, ERP, data warehouse, accounting system] via versioned, documented APIs
  
• Revenue recognition compliant with ASC 606 / IFRS 15, including waterfall reporting and deferred revenue handling
  
• ML-powered payment recovery: intelligent retry scheduling, Network Token support, automatic card updater, and configurable dunning sequences
  
• Real-time dashboards covering MRR, ARR, churn, trial conversion, and recovery efficacy
  Customer self-service portal for subscription and payment management
  

Optional deliverables:

• AI-driven revenue forecasting and predictive churn scoring
  
• Support for multi-entity or hierarchical account structures
  
• Embedded billing capabilities for SaaS platforms reselling to their own customers
  
• Agentic commerce support — APIs and authentication patterns that allow AI agents to initiate, modify, and cancel subscriptions on behalf of customers
  
• Embedded financial products — support for issuing, treasury, or lending products integrated with billing
  

B.4 Out-of-scope

Define what's excluded so vendors don't price or assume responsibility for it. Examples:

• Core payment processing infrastructure (handled separately by [payment provider])
  
• Fraud detection beyond standard billing-level controls
  
• Full ERP or general ledger functionality
  

B.5 Desired outcomes

• Payment recovery rate above [X]% within six months of go-live
  
• Automated tax calculation covering [X] markets at launch
  
• Time-to-invoice for new pricing models reduced from [current state] to [target]
  
• Full ASC 606-compliant revenue reporting without manual reconciliation
  
• API response latency under 300ms at p99 for all billing operations
  

Section C: Proposal instructions

If you don't specify how you want proposals formatted, you'll receive everything from 5-page slide decks to 200-page PDFs. This section standardizes what you receive so you can compare vendors side by side.

Here’s an example of how this could look.

C.1 Submission format and structure

Each proposal must follow this structure. Submissions that deviate significantly or omit required elements may be deemed noncompliant:

• Executive summary (3 pages maximum)
  
• Responses to all requirements in Section E, numbered to match
  
• Completed pricing template in Excel
  
• Vendor profile and financial summary
  
• Minimum three client references
  
• Supporting documents: compliance certifications, case studies, API documentation excerpts
  

C.2 Formatting requirements

• Narrative responses as PDF; pricing template as Excel.
  
• Minimum 11pt font, 1-inch margins, page numbers required.
  
• All monetary figures in USD unless otherwise specified.
  
• File naming: [Vendor name]–Billing–RFP–[Date].pdf
  

C.3 Proposal content guidance

Executive summary

• Explain directly how your solution addresses [your company]'s goals in Section B.
  
• Lead with measurable outcomes — recovery rates, authorization rate improvements, deployment timelines — not product descriptions.
  
• Include your vision for this partnership over three years.
  

Solution overview

• Describe how your platform handles complex pricing scenarios — usage-based metering, multi-attribute pricing, mid-cycle plan changes, and entitlement management.
  
• Detail your API architecture, SDK availability, webhook reliability, and sandbox parity with production.
  
• Explain how your ML capabilities improve payment recovery and reduce churn.
  

Implementation plan

• Provide a draft project timeline with milestones: configuration, integration, testing, UAT, and launch. Identify vendor and client responsibilities at each phase.
  

Security and compliance

• Confirm PCI DSS v4.0 compliance (effective March 2024) and most recent audit date.
  
• Describe data residency options and privacy controls for GDPR and CCPA.
  
• Detail your incident response process and client notification timelines.
  

API and developer capabilities

• Provide API latency benchmarks (p50, p95, p99), uptime history, and your approach to versioning and backward compatibility.
  
• Include a link to your developer documentation or sandbox environment.
  

C.4 Clarification and questions

Questions must be submitted in writing by [question deadline] to [RFP manager's email]. Answers will be distributed to all participants simultaneously. No informal discussions with other [your company] employees are permitted during the process.

C.5 Proposal validity

Proposals must remain valid for 90 days from the submission deadline unless extended by written mutual agreement.

C.6 Right to reject or negotiate

[Your company] reserves the right to reject any proposal, request clarifications, or enter parallel negotiations with one or more vendors. Participation does not constitute a commitment to purchase.

Section D: Evaluation process

Transparency in scoring pushes vendors to respond with evidence rather than marketing copy. Every criterion below maps to a specific question in Section E — so vendors who read this know exactly where to focus.

Here’s an example of how this could look.

D.1 Evaluation methodology

All proposals will be reviewed by a cross-functional team including Finance, Engineering, Compliance, and RevOps. The evaluation runs in three stages:

• Compliance review: confirm all required documents are present and meet formatting requirements.
  
• Qualitative assessment: score each submission against the weighted criteria below using a 1–5 scale (5 = exceptional; 1 = fails to meet baseline).
  
• Demonstration and final review: short-listed vendors will be invited for live platform demonstrations.
  

D.2 Evaluation criteria and weights

The above weights are adjustable depending on project priorities but must total 100%.

D.3 Demonstration requirements

Short-listed vendors will demonstrate:

• End-to-end billing flows in a live sandbox: subscription creation, mid-cycle plan change, usage-based invoice generation
  
• Real-time usage metering ingestion, aggregation, and billing
  
• Dunning configuration, ML retry logic, and recovery reporting dashboard
  
• *API call walkthrough including latency, error handling, and webhook delivery confirmation
  
• Customer portal and internal dashboard functionality*
  
• Agentic commerce scenario — an AI agent or automated workflow initiating a subscription action via API
  

Vendors must provide temporary demo credentials valid for at least 10 business days after the demonstration.

D.4 Negotiation and contract award

[Your company] reserves the right to conduct clarification sessions, request best-and-final offers, and negotiate with one or more vendors. No contract is binding until executed by both parties.

⚑ Evaluator notes — remove before sending to vendors ⚑

• Score independently before group deliberation. Justify every score above 4 or below 2 with evidence from the submission or demo.
  
• Treat ‘Standard’ capability claims skeptically — require documentation or a live demo walkthrough.
  
• Prioritize vendors with documented ML recovery outcomes, p99 API latency under 300ms, and production-parity sandbox environments.
  
• Weight the agentic commerce criterion more heavily if your roadmap includes AI-driven customer journeys or autonomous subscription management.
  
• Flag red flags: vague pricing, compliance gaps in your key markets, missing sandbox, no published API SLA.
  

Section E: Core requirements

This is the most important section. Require factual, evidence-backed responses. Any vendor worth short-listing can point to production metrics, published documentation, and real client examples — not just claimed capabilities. For each requirement, vendors must indicate: Standard (in production today), Configurable (requires setup), Custom (requires development), or N/A.

Here’s an example of how this could look.

E.1 Selling and accepting orders

For sales teams

For the checkout flow

A checkout experience that loses customers at the payment step is a billing problem, not just a UX problem. Expect vendors to provide documented conversion lift data from production environments — not estimated figures.

For SaaS platforms

For global compliance

Global compliance is a continuous operational requirement. Compliance standards evolve: PCI DSS v4.0 became effective March 2024, and jurisdictions from India to Germany to Brazil impose specific billing obligations. Your vendor needs to track and implement these automatically, not wait for you to ask.

E.2 Billing and subscription lifecycle management

Pricing model flexibility

A billing platform that only handles flat-rate subscriptions is already limiting your go-to-market. Usage-based and multi-attribute pricing are now standard for SaaS and infrastructure businesses — your vendor needs to support them natively, not through workarounds.

Automation

The operational value of a billing platform scales directly with what it automates. Manual intervention in billing workflows is a source of errors, delay, and avoidable cost.

Ease of use

E.3 Collecting payments and reducing costs

Payment methods and authorization performance

Payment method coverage and authorization rates are direct revenue drivers — not a secondary concern. A 1% improvement in authorization rate on a recurring billing portfolio is real money. Expect vendors to provide documented authorization rate benchmarks from production environments, and to explain exactly how they achieve them.

Cost optimization

E.4 Retaining customers and recovering revenue

Reducing involuntary churn

Failed payments are the single largest driver of involuntary churn for subscription businesses. How a vendor handles payment recovery is a core competency that should be evaluated with the same rigor as pricing model support. Require production recovery rate data. If a vendor can't provide it, that's a signal.

Reducing voluntary churn

E.5 Agentic commerce and embedded financial capabilities

AI agents and automated workflows are increasingly initiating commercial transactions — scheduling subscription changes, responding to customer requests, and managing billing events without direct human action. Billing infrastructure built in 2025 needs to account for this. Vendors who haven't thought about agentic billing will create integration bottlenecks as you scale AI-driven customer experiences.

Agentic commerce

Agentic commerce refers to AI agents or automated systems that initiate, modify, or cancel subscriptions and billing actions on behalf of customers. This requires APIs and authentication patterns purpose-built for machine-to-machine interactions, not adaptations of human-facing flows.

Embedded financial products

Billing infrastructure that connects to adjacent financial products — card issuing, treasury, lending — creates compounding value for platforms and marketplaces. If you offer or plan to offer financial products alongside your core product, your billing vendor's ability to integrate with those products matters.

E.6 Reporting, analytics, and revenue recognition

Business performance reporting

Billing data is revenue data. Your vendor should give your Finance, RevOps, and leadership teams real-time visibility into what's happening across your subscriber base — not CSV exports you reconcile manually after the fact.

Revenue recognition and reconciliation

If your team is manually building revenue waterfall reports or reconciling billing data to your general ledger, that's a gap your next vendor should close. ASC 606 and IFRS 15 compliance should be built in — not bolted on after the fact.

Dispute management

E.7 API performance and developer experience

A billing platform you can't integrate reliably — or that degrades under load — is a serious liability. Evaluate API quality with the same rigor as functional coverage. Ask for production performance data, not benchmarks from synthetic test environments.

API performance

Developer experience

Integrations

E.8 Security, compliance, and data privacy

Compliance is a moving target. PCI DSS v4.0 became effective March 2024 and introduced new requirements around authentication, monitoring, and targeted risk analysis. GDPR enforcement has intensified since 2023, with regulators issuing record fines for data handling violations. Your vendor needs to stay current — not catch up.

E.9 Scalability and reliability

E.10 Vendor certification statement

I hereby certify that all responses are accurate as of the submission date and that capabilities marked Standard or Configurable are currently available in production environments. Claims not supported by documentation or a live demonstration will not be evaluated.

Authorized representative: ________________________
Title: ________________________
Date: ________

⚑ Evaluator notes — remove before sending to vendors ⚑

• Require quantitative evidence for all performance claims: recovery rates, authorization rates, API latency benchmarks, uptime figures.
  
• Validate API performance claims in the sandbox demo — measure actual latency, not vendor-provided figures.
  
• Flag any vendor that cannot demonstrate agentic billing scenarios in a sandbox environment.
  
• Treat missing ASC 606 support or no production-parity sandbox as disqualifying for billing-mature businesses.
  
• Verify PCI DSS v4.0 compliance specifically — v3.2.1 sunset was March 31, 2024.
  

Section F: Implementation and support

The best billing platform fails if the implementation doesn't go smoothly. This section probes whether the vendor has the methodology, resources, and support model to get you live without disrupting your billing operations — and keep you running reliably afterward.

Here’s an example of how this could look.

F.1 Implementation approach and timeline

Vendors must describe:

• Project management framework (agile, waterfall, hybrid) and how progress is tracked and reported to the client.
  
• Typical time to go live for clients of comparable scale and pricing complexity.
  
• How integration risks — particularly with CRM, ERP, and data warehouse — are identified and mitigated.
  
• How a parallel billing run or cutover strategy protects revenue continuity during migration.
  

F.2 Resourcing and governance

Vendors should provide:

• Org chart or RACI diagram for the implementation team.
  
• Confirmation of whether key roles are in-house or subcontracted.
  
• Named account manager and solution architect assigned to this engagement.
  
• Escalation hierarchy and decision-making cadence.
  

F.3 Training and knowledge transfer

Vendors should describe:

• Training available for Finance, RevOps, Engineering, and Customer Success.
  
• Availability of on-demand training, documentation, and certification paths.
  
• How training materials stay current with new product releases.
  

F.4 Support model and service levels

Vendors must specify:

• Support tiers and what's included at each.
  
• Availability of 24/7 support for critical billing incidents — a billing outage is a revenue outage.
  
• Response time SLAs by severity level.
  
• How clients are notified in real time during incidents.
  
• Historical uptime performance — minimum target is 99.9%; preference for 99.99%+.
  

F.5 Maintenance and upgrades

Vendors should explain:

• How product releases are communicated — release notes, changelogs, advance notice periods.
  
• API versioning and deprecation policy (minimum 12 months advance notice for breaking changes).
  
• Whether upgrades can be deployed without billing downtime.
  

F.6 Continuous improvement

Describe how you use platform analytics, ML-driven insights, and proactive monitoring to improve billing performance over time. Provide specific examples of measurable improvements delivered to existing clients — recovery rate increases, authorization rate improvements, or reduction in billing-related support tickets.

F.7 Vendor attestation

I certify that all implementation and support details provided here are accurate as of the submission date and reflect current production practices and service levels.

Authorized representative: ________________________
Title: ________________________
Date: ________

⚑ Evaluator notes — remove before sending to vendors ⚑

• Validate timeline commitments against comparable engagements — ask for specific examples, not ranges.
  
• Confirm 24/7 support is genuine — request examples of recent critical incident response times.
  
• Ask whether the implementation team is the same team that handles post-launch support.
  
• Require written API deprecation policy before contract signature.
  

Section G: Commercials

Billing platform pricing can be opaque. This section standardizes how vendors present costs so you can compare like for like. If you don't require itemized disclosure upfront, you'll discover bundled fees and minimum commitments after the contract is signed.

Here’s an example of how this could look.

G.1 Pricing structure overview

Vendors must provide:

• Itemized pricing for all components — platform fees, per-transaction fees, usage fees, and add-ons.
  
• A narrative explaining pricing assumptions: volume tiers, currency mix, billing event estimates.
  
• Clear identification of any minimum monthly commitments or threshold pricing.
  
• All figures in USD; if quoting other currencies, include conversion logic.
  

G.2 Pricing components

G.3 Volume tiers

Provide a sensitivity analysis showing how pricing changes at the following volumes:

G.4 Contract terms and flexibility

• Available contract lengths and associated pricing incentives.
  
• Whether pricing scales down automatically if volume decreases.
  
• Renegotiation process for multiyear contracts.
  
• Minimum spend requirements.
  
• Exit clauses and data portability terms — how is your data returned, in what format, and on what timeline?
  

G.5 Assumptions and dependencies

List all commercial assumptions underpinning your pricing — including volume minimums, exclusivity requirements, specific payment methods, or geographic scope. Unstated assumptions discovered after contract execution may be treated as a material misrepresentation.

G.6 Vendor certification

I certify that the pricing and commercial information in this proposal is complete and accurate as of the submission date and reflects all applicable discounts, fees, and terms.

Authorized representative: ________________________
Date: ________

⚑ Evaluator notes — remove before sending to vendors ⚑

• Reconcile all figures against the Excel pricing sheet — discrepancies are a red flag.
  
• Watch for bundled fees that obscure per-unit costs, particularly for metering and dunning.
  
• Assess data portability terms carefully — lock-in often happens at the data layer, not the contract layer.
  
• Flag any vendor that cannot provide volume sensitivity analysis.
  

Section H: Vendor profile

A billing platform is a long-term infrastructure partner. You need to know the company behind the product — its financial health, engineering depth, and trajectory — not just whether today's feature list looks right.

Here’s an example of how this could look.

H.1 Company overview

Provide a two- to three-paragraph summary covering your history, mission, and market position. Emphasize experience supporting enterprise-scale, multi-market billing operations and your track record maintaining compliance as regulations evolve.

H.2 Leadership and key personnel

Brief bios (three to five lines) for key leaders involved in this engagement. Describe their technical or compliance expertise and any relevant certifications.

H.3 Financial stability

Provide audited financial statements or equivalent evidence of solvency. Private companies should provide a CFO letter certifying liquidity. Describe your funding structure if applicable.

H.5 Product road map

Provide a high-level road map covering upcoming releases over the next 12–18 months. Highlight planned investments in ML-powered features, agentic commerce support, global compliance coverage, and API performance. Explain how customer feedback influences your prioritization.

H.6 Partnerships and ecosystem

List key technology and channel partnerships relevant to this engagement. Describe how these enhance reliability, compliance coverage, or integration depth.

H.7 Environmental and sustainability practices

Describe practices that reduce environmental impact — digital receipts by default, paperless invoicing, insights into payment method environmental footprint. Explain how sustainability is embedded in your platform operations.

H.8 Vendor statement of accuracy

I certify that all information in Section H is accurate as of the submission date and that [vendor] has the financial, technical, and operational capacity to perform the described services.

Authorized representative: ________________________
Date: ________

Section I: References

References from comparable customers tell you more than any demo. Prioritize references that look like your business — similar pricing complexity, scale, and regulatory footprint. Generic references from different verticals or much smaller businesses don't predict your experience.

Here’s an example of how this could look.

I.1 Reference requirements

Vendors must provide a minimum of three client references meeting these criteria:

• Comparable billing volume to [your company]
  
• Similar pricing model complexity — usage-based or multi-attribute pricing preferred
  
• Overlapping geographic and regulatory footprint
  
• Active customer in production for at least 12 months
  

I.3 Reference outcome summary

For each reference, provide measurable outcomes: payment recovery improvement, authorization rate change, deployment timeline, revenue recognition automation achieved. Include client testimonials where available.

I.4 Reference validation

I confirm that each client has consented to serve as a reference and that all information provided is accurate.

Authorized representative: ________________________
Date: ________

⚑ Evaluator notes — remove before sending to vendors
⚑

• Call at least two references by phone — written summaries are curated.
  
• Ask specifically about implementation experience and what went wrong, not just the platform in steady state.
  
• Ask references whether the vendor's ML recovery claims held up in production.
  
• Flag generic, unverifiable, or clearly mismatched references.
  

Section J: Appendixes

J.1 Submission checklist (vendor use)

Attach as the first page of your response packet. Incomplete submissions may be excluded from evaluation.

J.2 Glossary of terms

J.3 Evaluation scoring matrix (internal use)

For each vendor, calculate the following:

• Billing (25%)
  
• API (15%)
  
• Recovery (15%)
  
• Compliance (15%)
  
• Reporting (10%)
  
• Agentic (5%)
  
• Support (5%)
  
• Commercials (10%)
  
• Weighted total
  

J.4 Billing requirements quick-reference checklist

A condensed checklist for vendor self-assessment before submission.

Selling and accepting orders

• CRM integration for quote creation
  
• Quote-to-subscription and quote-to-invoice conversion
  
• Multi-currency quoting
  
• Web, mobile, and in-person checkout
  
• Saved credentials / Link-equivalent for returning customers
  
• Fraud detection with low false-decline rates
  
• 3DS2 with PSD2 exemption handling
  
• ACH, SEPA, pre-authorized debit, BACS mandate support
  
• RBI mandate compliance
  
• Germany Kündigungsbutton single-click cancellation
  
• Locally compliant invoice templates including Brazil Nota Fiscal
  
• OFAC / sanctions screening
  

Billing and subscription management

• Flat-rate, tiered, volume, and graduated pricing
  
• Usage-based billing with configurable aggregation
  
• Multi-attribute pricing (seats + usage)
  
• Entitlement management for feature gating
  
• Free trials, prepayment, installments
  
• Automated tax calculation: sales tax and VAT
  
• Proration logic
  
• Bulk subscription changes and hierarchical accounts
  
• Customer self-service portal
  

Payments, recovery, and authorization

• Cards, wallets, bank debits, bank transfers
  
• Network Token support for recurring authorization improvement
  
• ML-powered dunning with dynamic retry (Adaptive Acceptance or equivalent)
  
• Automatic card updater
  
• Predictive retry with documented recovery rate
  
• Local acquiring
  
• Level II / III data and AVS / zip code passthrough
  
• FX fee optimization
  

Agentic and embedded capabilities

• Machine-to-machine API authentication for agent-initiated billing
  
• Granular API permissions / OAuth scopes
  
• Audit trail for agent-initiated actions
  
• Card issuing and treasury integration
  
• Pay-later / financing at checkout
  

Reporting and revenue recognition

• Real-time MRR, ARR, churn, NRR dashboards
  
• Recovery efficacy and deflection reporting
  
• Data warehouse connectivity
  
• ASC 606 / IFRS 15 revenue recognition
  
• Revenue waterfall and deferred revenue schedules
  
• ERP and accounting system integration
  
• AI-driven revenue forecasting
  

API, security, and technical

• p99 API latency under 300ms — documented from production
  
• 99.9%+ uptime SLA with historical data
  
• Full sandbox with production parity
  
• Versioned API with 12-month deprecation notice
  
• PCI DSS v4.0 (March 2024)
  
• SOC 2 Type II
  
• GDPR and CCPA data privacy controls
  
• Data residency options
  

J.5 Vendor submission certification

I certify that this submission is complete and that all information provided is accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that [your company] reserves the right to verify any claims made in this response.

Company name: ________________________
Authorized representative: ________________________
Title: ________________________
Signature: ________________________
Date: ________