Requests for proposals (RFPs) help many businesses find effective procurement partners. But as with all collaborations, they come with risks, including weak vendor controls, unrealistic timelines or budgets, and hidden compliance gaps. Third-party risks can cost businesses as much as $1 billion per incident. You must manage risks in RFP processes as soon as you start defining the project and do so through every stage of the RFP life cycle.
Teams that use RFPs effectively evaluate risks by incorporating vendor risk assessment in every step of the process. Below, we’ll explain how to manage risks in RFP processes effectively, how to structure your RFPs to mitigate risk, and how to identify risks in vendors’ responses.
What’s in this article?
- How can you manage risks in the RFP process effectively?
- How can organizations structure an RFP to identify potential risks early?
- How can teams use vendor RFP responses to predict risks?
- What other risk management tactics can businesses incorporate into vendor selection processes?
- What practices help organizations control for risks throughout the RFP life cycle?
- How Stripe Payments can help
How can you manage risks in the RFP process effectively?
Managing risks in the RFP process effectively means watching for issues that could derail business outcomes (e.g., exceeded business budgets, unreliable vendors, compliance failures) and avoiding them.
Risk management begins when you start establishing requirements and continues through how vendors interpret those requirements, how you evaluate their responses, how the contract is written, and how the work gets done. RFP decisions can shape an organization’s logistics, costs, and exposure for years.
Effective risk management involves:
Building in clarity: Write the RFP in a way that forces teams to articulate what they need and how they expect the work to unfold. This structure reveals gaps and constraints before choices are locked in.
Reading responses for risks: Address timeline concerns, technical challenges, and compliance obligations that appear in vendors’ responses. Doing so before contracting keeps small issues from becoming structural problems.
Asking directly: Make risk a visible part of vendor evaluation to filter out bidders with weak controls or limited experience. This makes it easier to scrutinize unusually low-budget proposals for hidden long-term costs.
Engaging higher-quality vendors: Seek vendors with mature risk practices that can prove they have strong controls, transparent processes, and reliable delivery histories. Avoiding vendors that lack these differentiators helps prevent risk.
How can organizations structure an RFP to identify potential risks early?
It’s possible to design an RFP so the responses identify potential risks. They might appear in your assumptions or a vendor’s capabilities.
Here’s how to do so:
Get stakeholder input: Bring affected teams into your design process. Their perspectives can reveal vulnerabilities and help you write an RFP that reflects the work accurately.
Set clear requirements: Clarify what you need in detail so vendors can’t misinterpret scope, timelines, or expectations. But be efficient. An RFP that feels overly burdensome can deter the strongest vendors.
Request case studies: Ask vendors about past projects that are comparable in scale and complexity. Include questions about risk mitigation, and request specific examples.
Get evidence of controls: Collect a vendor’s safety records, insurance verification, certifications, quality assurance practices, or all of the above. If the work touches sensitive data (e.g., consumer-permissioned data) or regulated areas, write those expectations into the RFP, and require proof of performance.
Give contract terms up front: Share your risk-oriented contract clauses, such as liability limits and service-level expectations, before evaluation begins. The right vendors will accept those terms.
How can teams use vendor RFP responses to predict risks?
Once proposals arrive, the task shifts from designing for clarity to looking for signals. Every vendor response contains clues as to where risks reside.
The RFP evaluation committee should watch for concerning elements of vendor responses, such as:
Suspiciously low cost: A proposal with a strikingly low price can mask shortcuts or an incomplete understanding of the work. Selecting a vendor on cost alone often leads to quality issues, missed deadlines, or spending that erases the initial savings.
Inconsistency across the proposal: When promises sound absolute or gloss over complicated areas without explanation, that suggests a higher risk profile. Cross-check claims, numbers, and descriptions.
Thin or mismatched experience: Has this vendor executed similar projects at the scale you need? A polished proposal can’t make up for a lack of experience.
Vagueness or incompleteness: When a proposal leans on vague language or avoids detail, that often points to a gap in capability or preparation. Look for direct, specific answers that address your requirements.
Lack of credentials: Credentials mean a vendor has undergone legitimate vetting. Look for current certifications, independent audits, insurance coverage, compliance documentation, and financial analytics and stability indicators.
Unrealistic execution plans: An aggressive schedule or oversimplified plan can signal underestimation, which becomes a delivery-phase risk for you. Examine each vendor’s timeline, dependencies, and assumptions.
What other risk management tactics can businesses incorporate into vendor selection processes?
Beyond RFP design and vendor responses, you can manage risks in the decision-making process. Here are a few more ways to spot and compare potential weaknesses:
Define evaluation criteria: If your team doesn’t agree on how proposals should be judged, the process becomes uneven and more difficult to defend. Ambiguous criteria push vendors to guess what matters, which leads to inconsistent responses and uneven comparisons.
Communicate well with vendors: Slow or scattered communication creates confusion for vendors and evaluators. Be consistent with updates and Q&A responses, and clarify decision timelines.
Weigh risk in your scorecard: Use a proposal evaluation scorecard that assesses capabilities and exposure. Consider experience level, controls, risk mitigation plans, and financial health. A consistent scoring method gives you a comparative risk summary across all possible vendors.
Do your due diligence: At the finalist stage but before vendor onboarding, validate each proposal by making reference calls, checking public records, and confirming any certifications. This step often reveals strengths or vulnerabilities that proposals alone can’t show.
What practices help organizations control for risks throughout the RFP life cycle?
You must manage risks in the RFP process during planning, vendor selection, and the collaboration that follows. Staying vigilant throughout the life cycle can minimize surprises.
Here’s how you can control for risks:
Prepare properly: Bring the right people together early to outline needs, constraints, and risk considerations. Leadership in strategic procurement and RFPs is key.
Communicate well: Use Q&A stages, vendor briefings, and internal calibration meetings to ensure everyone works from the same information during the RFP process.
Negotiate effectively: Once you’ve chosen a vendor, use contract discussions to close gaps you spotted during review. Clarify roles, require specific protections, and ensure risk-related terms fit the project.
Maintain oversight: Treat delivery as a continuation of the RFP. Do regular check-ins and performance reviews, and keep an up-to-date risk register.
Adjust as conditions change: Monitor new regulations, developing standards, or shifts in the vendor’s environment, and revisit the plan when needed.
Assess afterward: When the project is finished, examine what worked and what didn’t. Apply that insight to future RFPs to strengthen your ability to spot risks early.
How Stripe Payments can help
Stripe Payments provides a unified, global payment solution that helps any business—from scaling startups to global enterprises—accept payments online, in person, and around the world.
Stripe Payments can help you:
Optimize your checkout experience: Create a frictionless customer experience and save thousands of engineering hours with prebuilt payment user interfaces (UIs), access to 125+ payment methods, and Link, a wallet built by Stripe.
Expand to new markets faster: Reach customers worldwide and reduce the complexity and cost of multicurrency management with cross-border payment options, available in 195 countries across 135+ currencies.
Unify payments in person and online: Build a unified commerce experience across online and in-person channels to personalize interactions, reward loyalty, and grow revenue.
Improve payment performance: Increase revenue with a range of customizable, easy-to-configure payment tools, including no-code fraud protection and advanced capabilities to improve authorization rates.
Move faster with a flexible, reliable platform for growth: Build on a platform designed to scale with you, with 99.999% historical uptime and industry-leading reliability.
Learn more about how Stripe Payments can power your online and in-person payments, or get started today.
Innehållet i den här artikeln är endast avsett för allmän information och utbildningsändamål och ska inte tolkas som juridisk eller skatterelaterad rådgivning. Stripe garanterar inte att informationen i artikeln är korrekt, fullständig, adekvat eller aktuell. Du bör söka råd från en kompetent advokat eller revisor som är licensierad att praktisera i din jurisdiktion för råd om din specifika situation.